Parametric Modular Hose Library v0.2 (Q48042)

From Library of Open Source Hardware
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No description defined
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Parametric Modular Hose Library v0.2
No description defined

    Statements

    thingiverse.com
    0 references
    www.thingiverse.com
    0 references
    auto
    0 references
    1.0.0
    0 references
    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0
    0 references
    A busy few hours after my first attempt at a useful OpenSCAD design (http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:9446) and I've totally re-written and refactored the code into a parametric part library. It's still early days, but it already contains the basic building blocks and a bunch of basic parts (segments, nozzles, base plate). There is also a demo section in the library that will generate a full set of example parts. Or you can un-comment the lines at the bottom to render individual parts and export the STL. Module Structure Basic building blocks are defined as chainable modules, taking at least one common parameter - the bore of the hose. Thus alternate hose sizes are trivial to generate (1/4 inch, 1/2 inch, etc). Global Variables - tolerance = controls the distance between the ball and socket surfaces - definition = this defines the number of facets for curved surfaces (sets the $fn parameter) Parts in the Library - Hose segment - Extended hose segment (user defined length of "waist" between ball and socket) - Round Nozzle (user defined nozzle diameter) - Base Plate (user defined screw dia, defaults to M3) Feedback Any and all comments welcome, it would be great if someone could print off a few segments and let me know if they work! Updates 22 Jun 2011 - Uploaded v0.2 library, includes reduced wall thickness and increased distance between ball/socket surfaces (based on feedback from bohnded). Also added DoubleSocket module. For comparison, I've added a cross-sectional view of the latest hose segment alongside the loc-line part by charlespax - the ball/socket offset on my model is obviously still a bit tighter than charles', but not sure whether I should increase it further...?
    0 references
    en
    0 references
    0 references
    axford
    0 references